The current situation in Faculty's Social Sciences is about the planning about futures congress or seminares, and for me career the activity most important is the next ENEA or National meeting antrophology students. It will be in november. Those activities actually are the most well-know, but always there are different activities like talks, season movies and too many career meeting. Is enough with to look the walls and always are posters with some event here or in other place.
On the other hand, in the faculty there are always some problems about the career's subjects and there are constantly talks between students and teacher.
So, regarding the building, this faculty is good, but the bathoroom are too bad, and the dining casino is very small. But in general the rooms are fine.
In this respect,firstly I think that the publicity about academic activities is fine, but sometimes there are most advertising about out activities than into the faculty. In the same way, I think that there isn't exist worry enough in respect the subjects, because the subjects are frecuently more theoretical than practical, and when the people start to work, sometimes is difficult because they know only theories.
For improving all this situacion, I would have some changes in the mesh's career puting special atention in the mainly theoretical schools, I mean that for exemple, I would put subjects related with Chile or Americ, because the majority of the authors that we have to read are europeans or from United States.
Moreover, I would change the building, but for all these changes, in my opinion, would have to exist a central plataform of money with the way of to destiny the economical recourses for the all faculties in a equitable way.
Therefore, with this changes, I think that would have more recourses for to fix the building, to buy more books for the bookcase, and for to hire goods teachers.
All in all are immediate changes, but like a further recommendation, I think also that the open system for this faculty and in general for the university should be with other system that give opportunities to students of public school that in the PSU had bad marks. I talk about the Propedeutico system, a programm that in the Santiago University started few years ago, and it has been good results.
Well, finally, I think that the solution's key for all the problems is that the education would be free, yeah, the education is not a comercial product, I know that is the typical sentence that the people say, but is true, because isn't a mystery that the country's develpment is in the education and not in too many cell phone or computers.
martes, 13 de octubre de 2009
Suscribirse a:
Enviar comentarios (Atom)
The current situation in Faculty's Social Sciences is about the planning about futures congress or seminares, and for me career the activity most important is the next ENEA or National meeting antrophology students. It will be in november. Those activities actually are the most WW knowledge, but always there are different activities like talks, season movies and too many career meeting. To be WW enough with to look the walls and always are posters with some event here or in other place.
ResponderEliminarON the other hand, in the faculty WW always thera are some problems about the career's subjects and there are constantly talks between students and teacher.
So, regarding the building, this faculty is good, but the bathoroom are too bad, and the dining casino is WF smaller. But in general the rooms are fine.
In this respect,firstly I think that the publicity about academic activities is fine, but sometimes there are most advertising about out activities than into the faculty. In the same way, I think that there isn't exist worry enough in respect the subjects, because the subjects are frecuently more theoretical than practical, and when the people start to work, sometimes is difficult because they know only WF theorys.
For improving all this situacion, I would have some changes in the career's WW mesh puting special atention in the mainly theoretical schools, I mean that for exemple, I would put subjects related with Chile or Americ, because the majority of the authors that we have to read are europeans or from United States.
Moreover, I would change the building, but for all these changes, in my opinion, would have to exist a central plataform of money with the way of to destiny the economical recourses for the all faculties in a equitable way.
Therefore, with this changes, I think that would have more SP recourses for to fix the building, to buy more books for the bookcase, and for to hire goods teachers.
All in all ^are immediate changes, but like a further recommendation, I think also that the open system for this faculty and in general for the university should be with other system that give opportunities to students of public school that in the PSU had bad marks. I talk about the Propedeutico system, a programm that in the Santiago University started WW last years ago, and it has been good results.
Well, finally, I think that the solution's key for all the problems is that the education would be free, yeah, the education is not a comercial product, I know that is the typical sentence that the people say, but is true, because isn't a mystery that the country's develpment is in the education and not in too many cell phone or computers.
really critical!! I like that... Now, I think you might to mention first the topics you´re going to discuss and then discuss them in different paragraphs.. you know what I mean? that will give it more cohesion..
check it and let me know
miss
p.s you got a 5